Showing posts with label David Shields. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Shields. Show all posts

22 September, 2022

Five Books I Read This Summer

This summer was good to me; I didn't pass out from the heat, I wasn't bitten by any bugs, and I only got sunburned once. I even carved out a little time, between work and sleep, to read. What's more, the things that I read were of a particularly good variety.

When I learned from The New York Review of Books a few months ago that David Shields had published a new book, The Very Last Interview, reading it right away felt like an imperative. Twelve years ago, his much-praised literary "manifesto," Reality Hunger positively blew my mind. Critics said that The Very Last Interview was the best thing he'd written since. I haven't read anything Shields wrote in those intervening years, but I suspect they could be right.

Similarly to how Shields "wrote" the chapters of Reality Hunger by collaging snippets of other authors' work (flying in the face of what I once considered originality), he compiled The Very Last Interview from questions other have asked him during what seem to be downright torturous interviews. The result is a fascinating, surprising work that examines the nature of notoriety, the responsibility of the interviewer, and the narrow power of inquiry.

Albeit with less fervor, I also wanted for quite some time to read Toni Morrison, especially her debut novel, The Bluest Eye, about young Pecola Breedlove, a black girl who wishes more than anything else to have blue eyes. From its first scintillating pages, I understood myself to be setting off into a dangerous work of literature. No wonder Morrison caught the world's attention! She renders with uncomfortable closeness the details of poverty and decrepitude in which, in mid-century Ohio, several poor black families live. Where I expected a somewhat domestic book told straight, Morrison tipped me right over with her gorgeous, fluid prose. I could scarcely set The Bluest Eye down. When I did, feeling fairly bruised and battered by its unsettlingly beautiful ending, there was little in the way of cozy resolution on offer. All I can see fit to say is that Morrison clearly earned every bit of the praise she received.

Turning from the past to the future, I reached next for another 2022 release, a wonderful, unexpected gift from Emily C., who evidently pays keen attention to the titles of books that I mention in passing. In the hands of a less skillful author, the title of Olga Ravn's The Employees: A Workplace Novel of the 22nd Cenury (translated from the Danish by Martin Aitken) might be a giveaway of the big story within this small book. Not in Ravn's. What we have here is an expertly written, quietly experimental work of what I'll call literary sci-fi.

In a nonchronological series of numbered reports, the employees of an unnamed organization take turns detailing their interactions with several alien objects aboard the spaceship on which they work. The reports are anonymous. Some are as short as a single sentence. They document, in chilly, disconnected corporate fashion, degrading morale among the ship's human and synthetic workers, until the situation ultimately moves past the point of no return. Ravn's The Employees is space-faring speculative fiction not quite like any other I've read, and I want more.

It's a shame that The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories, by British fantasist Angela Carter, didn't feel quite so unique. Until her death in 1992, Carter wrote a breed of high Gothic fiction that lingered in murky dungeons and in the high, crumbling towers of damp castles. What she seems to have been known for was more her substance than her style. It was arguably Carter who first returned fairy tales to their dark roots, retelling the familiar stories of Snow White and Red Riding Hood with unsettling, sometimes nightmarish twists. The Bloody Chamber, from 1979, offers versions of "Bluebeard," "Puss-in-Boots," and multiple different takes on "Beauty and the Beast," each of which infuses the dry old stories with blood and other bodily fluids, and in doing so renders them sometimes all but unrecognizable.

It's Carter's style that I had a hard time with. The first paragraph of one story here, "The Erl-King," contains this sentence about late October, which typifies how she wrote: "There were crisp husks of beechmast and cast acorn cups underfoot in the russet slime of dead bracken where the rains of the equinox had so soaked the earth that the cold oozed up through the soles of the shoes, lancinating cold of the approach of winter that grips hold of your belly and squeezes it tight." Such ornate verbiage, like the impassable brambles surrounding Sleeping Beauty's castle, impeded my getting into these stories. I read them all, though, and found plenty to admire in this writer's ideas and her willingness to do what poets have always done: make it new.

After reading a couple of Franny Choi's pieces in The New Yorker and Poetry, I sought out her debut collection, Floating, Brilliant, Gone, with only the vaguest idea of what lay in store. The book contains one of those poems, "To the Man Who Shouted 'I Like Pork Fried Rice' at Me on the Street," Choi's response to a man who apparently accosted her on the street with a racist, sexually provocative remark. It's a strong poem, a thoughtful, witty rejoinder to a particularly odious brand of cretinism. I wish the rest of the collection were half as provocative. A dismaying percentage of Floating, Brilliant, Gone is given over to work that feels like juvenilia stuff that I imagine a younger Choi toiling over in great earnest after completing her geometry homework; stuff quite similar to what I committed to a purple crushed-velvet notebook that, mercifully, posterity didn't deem fit to preserve. Choi clearly has talent and a level of introspection that can serve a poet well, and I hope that this first published collection served her well on her journey to grow as an artist and human being.

21 September, 2018

Eighteen Books I Spent My Summer Reading

What better way to start the summer than with neuroscience? Longtime Pariah's Syntax followers know that I'm too big a book snob to fool around with thrillers, courtroom dramas, or anything by Dan Brown, which is why so few people recommend stuff to me — they think I'll snub their picks. At least this is my suspicion.

In any event, under my own advisement and typical degree of enthusiasm for promising reading material, I went all in on brain food (pun intended), with Do Zombies Dream of Undead Sheep?: A Neuroscientific View of the Zombie Brain, by Timothy Verstynen and Bradley Voytek, who pair neuroscientific fact with fictional flesh-eaters for educational effect. The Zombie Research Society should've been my first stop, looking for information to help me with my novel; although, I can at least boast that there's nothing I've written so far, using my existing knowledge of biological science, that needs rewriting.

I followed this kind-of fanciful material with a more grounded book by David Eagleman, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. If you want to know why schizophrenics can tickle themselves, why low-interest Christmas banking clubs are popular, or how real-time brain imaging can curb impulse eating, Incognito might be the book for you.

Despite my interest in the subject matter, neither of these titles thrilled me, unfortunately. Drown, on the other hand, the debut short-story collection by the peerless Dominican American author Junot Díaz was an unsentimental look at immigrant life, alive itself with Díaz's vibrant prose, that I finished in a day and a half. Its stories made me think seriously about the voice of one of my novel's characters, who's also bilingual. More than an excellent read, Drown also gave me the reassurance to stay true to that character's inner dialog, irrespective of which language it flows in.

With Milan Kundera's earthy and profound novel of ideas, The Unbearable Lightness of Being (translated from the Czech by Michale Henry Heim), which masquerades as a love story, I shaved another book off of the "Reality Hunger" cagegory of my Amazon wish list. "NOW A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE," touts the cover of my 1984 edition, but I'd like to know how that happened. The book is internalized and ruminative. (I love its passages meditating on the concept of kitsch.) However sexy, the film has got to be a shallow simulacrum.

Next on my ''Reality Hunger" list was the Booker Prize-winning The Sense of an Ending, by Julian Barnes. Wow. When the seemingly freewheeling school-days narrative of Barnes's novel, having ratcheted up with a species of intrigue in the narrator's later years, lifted its final veil and lay bare the true import of all that'd come before, it nearly stole my breath away.

Moving down the list of Booker Prize-winners in the prison library, I lit on Margaret Atwood's The Blind Assassin. It's a gorgeous, emotionally exhausting epic. Afterward, the conceptual majesty of Exit West: A Novel, by Mohsin Hamid, rejuvenated me. I'd read an excerpt from it in The New Yorker a while back and was still stunned by the beauty of this magical-realist tale of lovers on the run. Thanks go out to V.V., who ordered me this phenomenal text. Every page transported me.

And Emily: I know you selected the Kevin Brockmeier book Things That Fall from the Sky because it was on my wish list, but I really enjoyed critiquing its stories with you. In the end, it was almost like the first copy you ordered me hadn't even been destroyed in that Crossroads riot. Almost.

Kat the Human also got me a couple of books this summer. The first was the Raymond Carver collection All of Us. I can now say that I've read all of Carver's published poems. I might even be a better poet for having done so. At a minimum, some of his poems inspired new ones of my own, which, really, is how it always should be.

Back in July, when the blast-furnace heat absolutely drained me of any inclination to be outdoors, I sequestered myself with the fantastical imagination of China Miéville, which delivered me to worlds previously unthinkable (albeit no less miserable than mine). His 2016 novella, The Last Days of New Paris, a conceptual master stroke, I read in one night. His earlier, more deeply explored sci-fi novel Embassytown took somewhat longer and, surprisingly, pleased me less. Running low on Miéville novels to read, as I now am, feels like cause for worry.

Soul at the White Heat: Inspiration, Obsession, and the Writing Life misled me with that subtitle, which all but promises a collection of essays on the literary craft, by the venerable author and critic Joyce Carol Oates. It turned out to be a compilation of Oates's writings for The New York Review of Books, with a smattering of pieces from elsewhere. Of the former, her reviews, several read like stand-alone works in their own right: solid, entertaining, worth my time. But the book ends with three very blah boxing-related pieces, then a Lonely Planet essay, entitled "A Visit to San Quentin," that reads like what any moderately competent journalist could produce after a prison tour — not what I expect from a writer of Oates's caliber.

The young Londoner who authored What Is Not Yours Is Not Yours: Stories, Helen Oyeyemi, on the other hand, wowed me with these nine fantastic almost-fairy tales. She writes like a dream, lush and unsettling, and I'll be on the lookout for her other work, for sure.

Thanks to L.B., who follows @FreeByronCase on Twitter and likes all of my #ByronSays tweets (she's obviously too generous), a couple of surprise books came in August. In André Breton's short novel Nadja (translated by Richard Howard), the Surrealist offers a narrative of a relationship dubbed the epitome of Surrealism, the movement as a way of life. Funny, I was reminded, by passages like this one, of the kinds of romances I entered as a very young man:
[O]ne evening, when I was driving a car along the road from Versailles to Paris, the woman sitting beside me (who was Nadja, but who might have been anyone else, after all, or even someone else) pressed her foot down on mine on the accellerator, tried to cover my eyes with her hands in the oblivion of an interminable kiss, desiring to extinguish us, doubtless forever, save to each other, so that we should collide at full speed with the splendid trees along the road. What a test of life, indeed!
I used to think that interesting was everything, that anything less was as good as death. Breton writes, "It is by an extreme capacity for defiance that certain unusual people who have everything to hope and everything to fear from one another will always recognize one another.'' So of course I sought and found romances born of bizarrely destructive circumstances — but was my life, then, Surreal?

The other book that L.B. had sent was The Thing About Life Is That One Day You'll Be Dead. Great title, right? It's a quasi-memoir by David Shields, who wrote the book that recommended every title now listed under "Reality Hunger" in my wish list (and provided that category's name). The Thing About Life filled me with no small amount of existential dread, thanks to its barrage of actuarial data, but I'm fine with that. Sick, I know.

The second of the books sent by the aforementioned human, Kat, was another poetry collection, this one by Ann B. Knox. The listless, pastoral poems of Staying Is Nowhere did nothing for me, aesthetically, I'm sorry to say, but that doesn't mean I don't appreciate the gesture.

Much, much more to my liking was Zombies: A Cultural History, a surprise gift from an entirely different L.B., written by Roger Luckhurst. It wasn't materially helpful with my novel-in-progress but did enrich my understanding of the zombie genre/phenomenon in ways that'll doubtless improve the manuscript and (I hope) eventual book.

I finished out summer's last days wrapped in William Faulkner's sweltering world, with his breathless masterpiece Absalom, Absalom! — a gift from my mother (thanks again, Mum), who might know my tastes better than anyone.

09 January, 2014

The List: Reading October Through December 2013

The Tuesday pick-up trips I make from my housing unit to the property room are thrilling, as filled with expectation as a child’s Christmas morning. If I know a package is coming, I’ll sleep fitfully the night before, eager to open my eyes and dimly see the narrow white slip of paper in the cell door. If it’s there, I’ll clamber quietly down from my bunk and, squinting, hold it up to the sliver of light that comes in from across the walk, hoping the printed text reads:

NOTICE OF APPT
CASE 328416
04C 00247
PROPERTY8:30 A
If it’s not, I’ll check the clock at the head of the bed, reassure myself that it’s still too early for passes to have been doled out, then fade once more into sleep. 

A guard opens envelopes and boxes in front of me and writes their contents in my file. They’re handed through a little window, along with a receipt. I like to wait until I’m back in my cell before I study any books received, riffle pages, admire design and cover art, smell paper, run my finger down spines. Eventually I’ll get down to actually reading, but the initial experience I have with a book is always sensual, drawn out like a slow-burn courtship.

For as much joy as books provide me, I wonder now why and when I stopped using these introductions to “List” posts to publicly thank everyone generous enough to enrich my day-to-day with reading material. I hardly need to comb through previous posts to realize it’s been too long. Thank you to Mum, Lady Val, John A., Rosie M., Timothy Green at Rattle, Crabby Becky, and the Poetry Foundation, for the pleasure of printed matter this quarter.

* * * * *

Samuel R. Delany, Nova
At some point midway through this tale of interstellar adventure, I became aware of a weird habit I have. Nova is Delany’s ninth novel, written when the author was just twenty-five. It garnered great praise from critics. But it’s not the Delany work I was recommended. That would be Dhalgren, a much-lauded novel I’ve seen classified as sci-fi, magical realism, and something called slipstream fiction. Dhalgren’s still in print and not much different from Nova in price so why did I order the latter instead of the former? And why is this something I actually do often with authors whose writings I don’t yet know?

Some of my recommendation rebelliousness can be blamed on my skepticism — the same trait that makes me immune to sales pitches, unmoved by church hymns, and weird about accepting gifts. People go so buggy for all sorts of insipid bullshit. (Look at Two and a Half Men. Actually, no, don’t.) The author whose book does a number on critics or one of my trusted friends may have simply gotten lucky; one positively reviewed work could be a fluke. By choosing to read something else by the same author, I feel as though I’m doing my research, digging deeper, dragging the literary lake.

But isn’t that what you’re supposed to do only after you’ve read something impressive? Whose first William Golding encounter begins with The Inheritors rather than with Lord of the Flies? Who, after being urged to read David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas, adds The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet to his wish list instead? Me, that’s who. And rather than experiencing Delany’s praised literary achievement, which I was assured meets Byronic standards, I went for the space opera of Nova, which (sorry, Sam) doesn’t.

It’s not Delany’s fault. Nova’s take on an intergalactic society is a true product of its era — a forgivable shortcoming of much science fiction — and was probably compelling to readers in its pre-Star Wars, pre-Star Trek, pre-Stargate period. Now, though, it seems too much a relic, a relic worth studying if you’re into digging up writers histories... except most readers aren’t archaeologists.


Karen Russell, Vampires in the Lemon Grove
Dead presidents resurrect in the bodies of horses on an isolated farm. Girls contracted to manufacture silk in a Japanese factory find themselves metamorphosed into fuzzy worms who eat only leaves. A scarecrow four teens find lashed to a tree in the city park bears an uncanny resemblance to a disappeared schoolmate the boys used to bully.

Karen Russell’s stories play so beautifully within their realms of fantasy, obliterating notions of what genre is and should do, and I have yet to find one of them — printed in this or any other publication where her fiction’s appeared — that fails to delight. Vampires in the Lemon Grove confirms that I’ve got to read her debut novel, Swamplandia!, before I read any deeper into her lesser known works.


Richard A. Lanham, Style: An Anti-Textbook (Second Edition)
Thorough and eminently readable, Style amounts to a book-length jeremiad against the inattention to style in American college courses. It astutely points out how odd this is, considering the United States’ supposed desire to teach its citizenry prose composition. Lanham bemoans what he calls “The Books” — prescriptive texts, such as Strunk and White’s Elements of Style, full of dos and don’ts for the writer and would-be writer — which he says are either ambiguous or focus too much on clarity to give students an understanding of what vibrant, meaningful prose does. He makes his (mostly) valid points with verve and aplomb.

I got the recommendation for Style from Professor Brooks Landon’s Great Courses lecture series, Building Great Sentences, which I can’t say enough good things about.


David Shields, Reality Hunger: A Manifesto
Appropriation and the defiance of genre (AKA literary theft and disregard for fact) are the core values spoused by this brilliant work, which itself is a largely plagiarized, difficult-to-classify volume calling for a wholesale rethinking of what we, readers and especially writers, prize in literature. I couldn’t shut up about Shields’s cri de coeur the entire time I was mulling over its twenty-six chapters, and it’s hard to convey how profoundly they affected me. The inherent impossibility of factual recollection, the myth of originality, the limitations imposed by narrative — these struck me as radical ideas when I first read them, yet, on reflection, make more practical sense than what’s at play in most contemporary literature, which stagnates in boring, outmoded principles. There’s a lot to absorb here. I’m keeping Reality Hunger around for a second read. I think I’d be a fool not to.


Ursula K. Le Guin, Steering the Craft: Exercises and Discussions on Story Writing for the Lone Navigator or the Mutinous Crew
Write a one-page narrative without using a single punctuation mark (it won’ be grammatical, but that’s the point). Write a single sentence of 250 to 400 words, which tells a narrative. Write three separate narratives using first-person perspective, all describing the same scene or event.

Sound like your idea of a good time? They did to me, and were. I think writers of all skill levels will appreciate Steering the Craft, whether they’re after a worthwhile creative diversion, a jump-start for an idle mind, or a healthful stretch of writerly muscles.


Zubair Ahmed, City of Rivers
I opened this book, the third title (I believe) in McSweeney’s Poetry Series, to its title page and was tipped over by the sight of the poet’s actual signature there, in pen that bled oh-so-slightly through, with the date written as “01/18/13” — eleven months, to the day, before I held the book in my own hands. This happenstantial tidbit made my reading of City of Rivers immoderately serious, for it hammered home a point casual readers often let slip by unnoticed: these words were set down by a person who wanted what he had to say heard. I listened closely.

Ahmed was born and raised in Bangladesh — a shithole, by my understanding — and came to the States in 2005, while still in his teens. But what this group of the young poet’s work represents is less the immigrant experience (as if there could be only one!) than simply experience — of growing up where animal corpses rot in the streets, where leather factories foul the air, and where seven months of monsoon rains will not wash away the ash and dust that cling to everything, to everyone. Cities other than Ahmed’s native Dhaka make appearances in these poems, but in their shadows and sunrises lurk the memories of home, inescapable as his own skin.